Russia Warns It May Not Sign Landmark UN Arms Treaty
03 April 2013 | Issue 5101
The Moscow Times
Klipping The Moscow Times
Russia's UN envoy has warned that Moscow might not sign the first treaty on the global arms trade after it overwhelmingly approved by the UN General Assembly.
Russia, the world's second-largest arms supplier with an estimated $8 billion in sales last year, abstained in Tuesday's vote.
The final vote tally for the treaty meant to regulate the $70 billion business in conventional arms and keep weapons out of the hands of human rights abusers was 154 in favor, 3 against and 23 abstentions.
Russia's ambassador to the UN, Vitaly Chirkin, complained that the draft treaty lacked a clause banning the supply of weapons to non-state entities.
"Despite persistent appeals from many states, it still does not contain a ban on arms supplies to unauthorized nonstate entities," Churkin told reporters. "This is a considerable systematic flaw that will unavoidably affect the effectiveness of the implementation of the arms-trade treaty.
He said Moscow would take a hard look at the treaty before deciding whether to sign it.
China, the world's third-largest arms supplier with $1.8 billion in sales, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, also abstained Tuesday.
No. 1 arms supplier the United States voted in favor despite fierce opposition from the National Rifle Association, a powerful U.S. pro-gun lobbying group.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement the UN adopted "a strong, effective and implementable Arms Trade Treaty that can strengthen global security while protecting the sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade."
But it was unclear whether the U.S., whose arms sales totaled $8.8 billion last year, would be able to win congressional approval to join the treaty.
Several UN delegates said the treaty's effectiveness would be limited if major arms exporters refuse to sign it.
The Iranian, Syrian and North Korean delegations cast the sole votes against the treaty.
Iran, which is under a UN arms embargo over its nuclear program, is eager to ensure its arms imports and exports are not curtailed, while Syria's government is embroiled in a two-year civil war and relies on arms from Russia and Iran, envoys said.
North Korea is also under a UN arms embargo due to its nuclear weapons and missile programs.
Echoing Churkin, Syrian UN Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari said his government opposes the arms trade treaty because it does not ban the sale of weapons to non-state actors. He, however, was referring specifically to what his government describes as "terrorists" active in Syria. The civil war there has claimed at least 70,000 lives, according to UN estimates.
Syria routinely refers to rebels trying to oust President Bashar Assad as "terrorists" backed by foreign governments.
The treaty does not ban transfers to armed groups but says all arms transfers should be subjected to rigorous risk and human rights assessments first.
Arms control activists and rights groups have said a treaty was needed to halt the uncontrolled flow of arms and ammunition that they say fuels wars, atrocities and rights abuses.
The Arms Trade Treaty aims to set standards for all cross-border transfers of conventional weapons. It would also create binding requirements for states to review all cross-border arms contracts to ensure that arms will not be used in human rights abuses, terrorism or violations of humanitarian law.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed Tuesday's vote, saying the treaty "will make it more difficult for deadly weapons to be diverted into the illicit market and … will help to keep warlords, pirates, terrorists, criminals and their like from acquiring deadly arms."
The treaty will be open for signature on June 3 and will enter into force 90 days after the 50th signatory ratifies it. Mexican UN Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba told reporters it normally takes two to three years for a treaty to come into force, but said he hoped it would happen sooner in this case.
Material from Reuters is included in this report.
Russia, the world's second-largest arms supplier with an estimated $8 billion in sales last year, abstained in Tuesday's vote.
The final vote tally for the treaty meant to regulate the $70 billion business in conventional arms and keep weapons out of the hands of human rights abusers was 154 in favor, 3 against and 23 abstentions.
Russia's ambassador to the UN, Vitaly Chirkin, complained that the draft treaty lacked a clause banning the supply of weapons to non-state entities.
"Despite persistent appeals from many states, it still does not contain a ban on arms supplies to unauthorized nonstate entities," Churkin told reporters. "This is a considerable systematic flaw that will unavoidably affect the effectiveness of the implementation of the arms-trade treaty.
He said Moscow would take a hard look at the treaty before deciding whether to sign it.
China, the world's third-largest arms supplier with $1.8 billion in sales, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, also abstained Tuesday.
No. 1 arms supplier the United States voted in favor despite fierce opposition from the National Rifle Association, a powerful U.S. pro-gun lobbying group.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement the UN adopted "a strong, effective and implementable Arms Trade Treaty that can strengthen global security while protecting the sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade."
But it was unclear whether the U.S., whose arms sales totaled $8.8 billion last year, would be able to win congressional approval to join the treaty.
Several UN delegates said the treaty's effectiveness would be limited if major arms exporters refuse to sign it.
The Iranian, Syrian and North Korean delegations cast the sole votes against the treaty.
Iran, which is under a UN arms embargo over its nuclear program, is eager to ensure its arms imports and exports are not curtailed, while Syria's government is embroiled in a two-year civil war and relies on arms from Russia and Iran, envoys said.
North Korea is also under a UN arms embargo due to its nuclear weapons and missile programs.
Echoing Churkin, Syrian UN Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari said his government opposes the arms trade treaty because it does not ban the sale of weapons to non-state actors. He, however, was referring specifically to what his government describes as "terrorists" active in Syria. The civil war there has claimed at least 70,000 lives, according to UN estimates.
Syria routinely refers to rebels trying to oust President Bashar Assad as "terrorists" backed by foreign governments.
The treaty does not ban transfers to armed groups but says all arms transfers should be subjected to rigorous risk and human rights assessments first.
Arms control activists and rights groups have said a treaty was needed to halt the uncontrolled flow of arms and ammunition that they say fuels wars, atrocities and rights abuses.
The Arms Trade Treaty aims to set standards for all cross-border transfers of conventional weapons. It would also create binding requirements for states to review all cross-border arms contracts to ensure that arms will not be used in human rights abuses, terrorism or violations of humanitarian law.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon welcomed Tuesday's vote, saying the treaty "will make it more difficult for deadly weapons to be diverted into the illicit market and … will help to keep warlords, pirates, terrorists, criminals and their like from acquiring deadly arms."
The treaty will be open for signature on June 3 and will enter into force 90 days after the 50th signatory ratifies it. Mexican UN Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba told reporters it normally takes two to three years for a treaty to come into force, but said he hoped it would happen sooner in this case.
Material from Reuters is included in this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment